Bill Gates: Politics can get you depressed



Bill Gates, speaking with Brent Schlender on Friday at the inaugural Techonomy conference near Lake Tahoe, Calif.

(Credit:
Ina Fried/CNET)

LAKE TAHOE, Calif.–Bill Gates is a glass three-quarters-full kind of guy, but watching the U.S. political system fail to tackle big problems like health care is enough to get even him down.

“You can actually get depressed,” he said, wrapping up a talk at the Techonomy conference here. Earlier, Gates talked about a variety of issues including how online courses will reshape higher education and the need for better software modeling for diseases and other complex systems.

Gates said that the political process hasn’t shown itself to be very good at handling issues that “are complex enough that even the average elite voter has a hard time getting their mind around things”–issues like tax code, controlling medical costs, improving education or relations with China.

These things are just complicated enough that the main people who understand them are people who are biased about them,” Gates said. “The number of experts in these things that are unbiased is so few. So how does society, a democracy that has worked so well, make some of the tough trade-offs that, say to avoid climate change, that need to be made.”

Gates pointed to the recent debate over health care. He initially thought that there might be a responsible discussion about the long-term challenges that are driving up costs in the system, but instead he said it devolved quickly.

“We’ll call you a name and you call me a name,” he told the crowd. “You get money from this funny guy and I get money from this funny guy. No one really looked at what tough things would have to be done.”

Also, he said, that is a rare case where innovation is actually a significant part of the problem.

“It invents more expensive things that you have no mechanism not to pay for, at least in the United States,” he said. In other words, he was pointing out that medical technology creates new cures and treatments and tests, but often at very high costs that add to our overall health care bill.

To recover from the malaise, Gates said he thinks back to what life was like in the 1800s, with horse manure piling up and coal choking the air in cities like New York.

“It would be easy to be discouraged in 1800,” he said.

Bill Gates: Politics can get you depressed

Jobs calls Bloomberg story ‘total bull,’ says NYT ‘making things up’

Apple co-founder Steve Jobs publicly responded to an article that claimed he and other executives knew about the iPhone 4 antenna issues before the device was released, calling the piece “total bulls—.”

Apple had already publicly denied the Bloomberg report on Thursday, but at Friday’s iPhone 4 press conference, Jobs offered more candid remarks on the subject. Jobs made the comments as part of a question-and-answer session following Friday’s press conference, which included Chief Operating Officer Tim Cook and Senior Vice President of Macintosh Hardware Engineering Bob Mansfield.

“It’s a total crock,” Jobs reportedly said about the story. “We talked to everyone about it. We have a great community of scientists. They debate everything. And it’s healthy. The best ideas win.”

Bloomberg had claimed, in a story filed on Thursday, that Jobs and other Apple executives were warned that the design of the iPhone 4 could lead to reception problems. The report also alleged that a carrier partner of Apple’s had expressed concern about the iPhone 4 external antenna before the device launched in late June.

Jobs also referred to an article from The New York Times issued later Thursday, which said the antenna issues were partially software related, and could be fixed in a forthcoming update to the iOS mobile operating system. “They’re just making things up,” Jobs said of the Times article.

Other interesting comments made during the hourlong question-and-answer session at Friday’s press conference:

  • Jobs said the external antenna allows more space inside the phone for features like a larger battery, all while being smaller than the previous iPhone 3GS. The company has no plans to modify its design of the iPhone 4.

  • Apple said all companies produce cell phones with weak spots. Making a phone without one is impossible, they said.
  • There is a Sept. 30 limit for requesting a new case because the company wants to be able to reevaluate the promotion after some time.
  • There is a shortage of cases because Apple couldn’t tell its partners the dimensions of the iPhone 4 before it was announced. Apple will not change its approach in the future, because revealing a new product too far ahead of time will kill the sales of the existing model.
  • Jobs, Cook and Mansfield all held out their phones and revealed that none of them use protective cases on their iPhone 4.
  • It’s human nature to want to find a successful organization and bring them down, Jobs said. “I see it happening with Google, people trying to tear them down. And I don’t understand it… what would you prefer? That we were a Korean company, that we were here in America leading the world with these products… maybe it’s just that people want to get eyeballs on their sites.”
  • Jobs said Apple loves its customers so much, any option was considered, including a recall. But the number of users experiencing the issue and contacting AppleCare about it was so small, that they decided it wasn’t worth it. Customers’ biggest complaint about the iPhone 4: They can’t buy one, because it’s sold out.
  • Some users who have called to complain about iPhone reception have received a visit from Apple employees trying to discover the problems. “They’ve sent teams all over the country, visiting these people in their homes,” Jobs said. These people literally get a knock at the door from Apple engineers with a bunch of equipment and want to plug it in and test reception. We’re really serious about this.”
  • Jobs said his health is “fine.” He noted that he was doing better earlier this week, when he was on vacation in Hawaii.

Jobs calls Bloomberg story ‘total bull,’ says NYT ‘making things up’

Apple to enter a new golden age in 2010 with 70% earnings growth


In the four years I?ve followed Apple (AAPL) grow from a mere mid-sized tech stock to becoming the second largest corporation in the United States in terms of market capitalization, I never imagined that it or any other company of its size would be able to consistently grow its earnings by well over 50% a year.

While Apple is now larger than Microsoft (MSFT), Google (GOOG), Cisco (CSCO), Hewlett Packard (HPQ) and Intel (INTC), Apple still enjoys the growth rate of small cap tech stocks. A few weeks ago I wrote a detailed article entitled Apple?s $63.5 Billion Revenue Year where I offer comprehensive revenue estimates for Apple?s fiscal Q3 and Q4 of 2010 ? a must read for any Apple investor.

This article will pick up where that report left off, and take a look at Apple?s potential 2010 earnings. To get an idea of how deeply Apple continues to penetrate the market, last year the company produced 50% less in sales and over 71% less in earnings than it will this year. That means the 2010 Apple is nearly 50% larger than the Apple of 2009 ? almost an entirely different company. If this growth continues into 2011, Apple will surpass Exxon (XOM) to become the largest corporation in America. Not to mention that it already has more cash than any other company in the United States – $41 billion.

That is absolutely stunning when one considers that Apple recorded a whopping $43 billion in revenue during the 2009 reporting period ? almost double the $24 billion it recorded in 2007. While the market continues to generally slobber over the financial prospects of the iPhone and Apple?s business, I think it?s important to step back and examine exactly where Apple?s business stands. We often hear about the strength of Apple?s stock in very general terms. Yet, we rarely get a broad picture of Apple?s past, present and future growth rates.

Not only is Apple accelerating its revenue, it?s pushing more of that revenue to the bottom line. But while its sales are accelerating, the growth in the cost to run the entire Apple operation is barely climbing. This means Apple is becoming increasingly efficient at printing money as it makes more revenue per dollar spent to run the operation. This is something that every company, big or small, could only wish to achieve. It is very difficult to accelerate sales as a large cap tech stock while tempering costs.

Based on the analysis presented below, I?m expecting Apple to report $15.51 in earnings per share (EPS) on an explosive $63.409 billion in revenue in 2010. That compares to $9.08 in EPS on $42.9 billion in revenue in the fiscal year ended 2009. The two tables below outline my revenue and earnings estimates for Apple?s 2010 fiscal year. For those who would like to see my track record on Apple, you can find that record at Philip Elmer-DeWitt?s quarterly analyst review published in his Fortune column ?Apple 2.0.?

Apple in 2010

Again, this report will focus on Apple?s income statement based on the revenue estimates I?ve already published. For those who are interested on how I arrive at these revenue estimates, please refer to that article. I will also be publishing a detailed analysis of my Q3 2010 estimates in an earnings preview ahead of Apple?s numbers due out after the bell on Tuesday, July 20, 2010. Thus, to get a full picture of Apple?s 2010 fiscal year, I will present a detailed analysis of how, based on a projected revenue estimate of $18.9 billion for Q4, that a forecast of $4.90 in EPS logically follows.

Gross Margin Estimates: 41.9%

Anyone can draw relatively reliable quarterly estimates for Apple simply by analyzing the seasonal trends of consumer spending of Apple products. Once one arrives at rigorously thought out revenue estimates, he or she must then perform an analysis of each line item of Apple?s income statement starting with gross margin.

Gross margin is the amount of money Apple makes on each of its products less the cost it takes to make those products. The only costs considered are the manufacturing cost, the bill of materials, and the packaging cost. These costs are called the cost of goods sold or ?COGS.? Subtracting the total cost of goods sold from Apple?s overall revenue will give you Apple?s gross margin.

Determining what Apple?s total gross margin will be in any one of Apple?s fiscal quarters requires an understanding of which of Apple?s product tend to carry higher gross margins, a careful analysis of Apple?s guidance for gross margin, the seasonal trend, the strength of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Euro, and whether a newly introduced product carries a higher or lower gross margin relative to the company?s average.

For example, in Q2 Apple reported 41.67% in overall gross margin percentage. The relevant information required to forecast gross margin for Q3 is: (1) Apple?s comments where it guides down gross margin to 36% owing to supposed lower margins on the iPad; (2) the seasonal trend which suggests that Q3 is stronger than Q2 for the past 4 years; (3) the amount by which Apple generally beats its own forecast (its sizable), (4) the number of iPhones Apple sells as the iPhone possesses the highest gross margin of Apple?s products, (5) the collapse of the Euro which suggests that Apple will see some pressure on ASPs this quarter (though Apple has admitted to be hedged for this potential event) and (6) the lower ASP on the iPod and Macintosh this quarter.

Based on an analysis of these issues (which I will publish in my earnings preview), I arrive at a 40.3% gross margin estimate for Q3. For while Q3 generally outperforms Q2, the weakness in the dollar, and the introduction of the iPad will undoubtedly put margin pressure on Apple this quarter.

Yet, when looking at Q4 gross margin estimates, one must consider the fact that Apple will likely sell well over 11 million iPhones due to the introduction of the iPhone 4. Knowing the iPhone to enjoy higher gross margins than Apple?s other products, one should conclude that overall gross margins will strongly benefit from huge iPhone sales in Q4.

Moreover, since the introduction of the iPhone, Apple?s best quarter for gross margins has been Q4. In Q4 2008, gross margin jumped from 36.28% in Q3 to 38.57% in Q4. In 2009, Apple saw a 1% increase from 40.92% to 41.82%. As Apple is set to record explosive iPhone 4 sales in Q4, I?m expecting gross margin to rise to 41.9% from the projected 40.3% I?m expecting in Q3. The chart below outlines Apple?s gross margin percentage from 2006 to 2010, which include my estimates for Q3 and Q4 2010.

Apple in 2010

Operating Expenses: $2 Billion

Based on the gross margin percentage estimate of 41.9%, I?m looking for Apple to post $7.922 billion in overall gross margin. To arrive at operating income, one must project operating expenses. Operating expenses are all the expenses related to running the Apple operation. The geniuses at the Apple store, Steve Jobs? $1 income, the rental cost of all of Apple?s retail stores, the employees, the paperwork, the Apple campus in Cupertino and all other money spent to run the company are all what is included in operating expenses. Based on the current trend in Apple?s guidance, one can produce almost exact estimates for operating expenses.

There are several quarters where I was able to forecast these expenses almost perfectly because Apple would regularly guide $40 million under the actual results. Picking up on this trend, it has been relatively easy to predict these expenses. Yet, one must also consider the growth trend of these expenses to help facilitate a strong forecast.

For Q3, I arrived at an estimate of $1.850 billion in operating expenses based on Apple?s guidance, and based on the trend. Knowing that Q4 tends to be one of the highest quarters in terms of operating expenses due to Apple mass hiring to meet consumer demand of the iPhone and back to school shopping season, I?m expecting a $150 million bump to $2 billion in Q4. The chart below outlines Apple?s operating expenses from 2006 to 2010. Q3 and Q4 are merely estimates and actual results may vary.

Apple in 2010

Operating Income, OI&E and Income before Taxes

To arrive at operating income, income that Apple generates from its primary operations, one must simply subtract operating expenses from gross margin. Remember operating expenses are those expenses that only include the costs to run the entire Apple operation. Gross margin, on the other hand, is the amount of money Apple makes on the sale of each of its goods (revenue) minus the cost it takes to bring those goods into existence i.e. to make those goods. Thus, for Q4 I?m forecasting an operating income of $5.922 billion, which is the difference of subtracting $2 billion in operating expenses from the projected gross margin of $7.922 billion.

Yet, companies will regularly make and/or lose money on the sale of property, from interest on their cash deposits, or from investments. Good accounting requires that we keep that income or loss in a separate category because it would be inappropriate to suggest that income from an investment should be part of the income that Apple receives from the sale of its goods.

So under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) we have a line item in the income statement called ?Other Income & Expenses? or OI&E. Though the dollar amount of OI&E is generally a small amount compared to Apple?s operating income, it can and will regularly affect EPS and so it should be taken seriously. Based on Apple?s guidance, which generally undercuts or overstates OI&E by $5 million, I?m projecting OI&E to come in at about $50 million for Q3 and $35 million for Q4.

Finally, to arrive at income before a provision for income taxes, one only needs to add operating income to OI&E. In this case, I?m expecting $5.922 billion in operating income, and $35 million in OI&E for Q4. Thus, we arrive at a net income before taxes of $5.972 billion.

Provision for Income Taxes & Net Income

Income taxes can greatly influence the outcome in earnings per share, and thus demands careful consideration. Evidence suggests that Apple will post some very favorable tax rates for Q3 and Q4 of 2010. In Q2, Apple already posted an unusual low tax rate of 23.7%, and looks to continue that rate, based on its guidance, in Q3 and probably in Q4. Q4 is generally Apple?s most favorable tax rate quarter but only slightly better than Q3.

For Q3, I?m estimating a tax rate of 23.4% based on Apple?s comments for the quarter. I?m also expecting a very favorable rate of 23.0% in Q4. Thus, based on a tax rate of 23.0% for Q4, I?m looking for Apple to record a post tax profit of $4.587 billion in fiscal Q4. The chart below outlines Apple?s tax rate, inclusive of my Q3 and Q4 estimates, from 2006 through 2010.

Apple in 2010

Earnings Per Share

Once you arrive at net income, the job is basically done. One only needs to divide net income by the number of projected outstanding diluted shares to arrive at Earnings Per Share or EPS. Based on a projection of 935 million shares outstanding at the end of Q4 2010, my estimates are calling for Apple to report $4.90 in EPS on $18.906 billion in revenue versus the current consensus of $3.73 in EPS on a conservative $16.54 billion in revenue. The chart below outlines Apple?s EPS growth from 2006 to 2010. This chart presents undeniable evidence that Apple has entered yet another golden age of growth. Apple is truly firing on all cylinders.

Apple in 2010
Apple in 2010
Apple in 2010

Apple?s Earnings History

The four tables below present Apple?s revenue and earnings history from 2006 to 2010. Due diligence begs the average investor to have at least a general working knowledge of these tables. These income statements have been amended to account for Apple?s new GAAP accounting measures. These new accounting measures were implemented in Q1 2010 resulting in dramatic amendments to each of Apple?s fiscal quarters between 2007 and 2010. These income statements can also be found on Apple?s website.

Apple in 2010

Apple?s Year over Year Growth Rates

The three tables below outline Apple?s (AAPL) year-over-year growth rates for the past 3 fiscal years. The first thing that should be noticed is how Apple?s growth rate decelerated in 2009, and then reaccelerated in 2010. These tables are a very useful guide for performing fundamental analysis and establishing price targets on Apple. Also note the 75% net income growth and the 70.8% EPS growth in fiscal 2010. If this type of growth continues into 2011, then Apple will likely see $350 sometime next year.

Apple in 2010

Andy Zaky is a graduate from the UCLA School of Law, an AppleInsider contributor and the founder and author of Bullish Cross — an online publication that provides in-depth analysis of Apple’s financial health.
Apple to enter a new golden age in 2010 with 70% earnings growth


Tips for quick recovery from plastic surgery

Plastic surgery is a complicated process and it needs proper care in post- surgery period for quick recovery. The article has discussed the dos and don’ts in post surgery period.

It is better to take a few days care before a patient can opt for joining back to his office. It is always good to have prior consultation with doctor.

It is better to take rest for a few days in its true sense. That is why apart from leave taken from house, you need to reduce your household activities as well.

Sometime in post surgery phase doctors ask to take some diagnostic taste to evaluate the medical condition of the patient in post-surgery period. However, the patients should not reluctant in these cases and should follow doctor’s instruction properly.

It is not possible for the patients perhaps immediately to drive; therefore, in post surgery period it is wise to arrange transport to help unwinding pressure from the patient.

It is better if somebody gets to accompany the patient at the place of operation and to stay with the patient for the first night after the surgery is executed.

It might be bothering for a patient to tell all his friends that he/she is going for surgery. In these situations it is easy to let them know that he/she is going for health check ups in a health clinic. It will be realistic approach to expect to look like same or slightly different after the surgical treatment over. This realistic approach will help in face the worse situation if anything happens likewise.

It is always recommended to get all the medications readily purchased, and some nearest relatives are to be aware about the emergency numbers in case the patient feels any problem in post-surgery period at home.

Those who hade undergone facial plastic surgery should apply crushed ice in a pouch on the bandage. It will help to get quick relief from pain, swelling, as well as chance of bruising.

It may take 48-72 hours to be fit after the session of plastic surgery. It is better to arrange for a care staff for this short period so that the patient should be at complete care. It will speed up the recovery process.

Frequent re-hydration is an authentic way to substantiate the loss of fluid due to this surgical process. It is good to take plenty of water and diluted fruit juice to replenish the lost body fluid for faster recovery and better health.

After having plastic surgery on neck or on head, it is recommended to keep head high up. The head elevation will help in speedy recovery as well as this posture will prevent fluid accumulation on the sore caused by the surgery and initiate better pain management.

What to anticipate after surgery

  • Expect to look worse before you look better.
    Nearly all cosmetic surgery procedures involve swelling and bruising. As swelling and bruising fades, you will begin to see your result.
  • If you had surgery on your face or neck, keep your head elevated for two to three days to minimize swelling and speed recovery. Do not underestimate the importance of elevation: keeping your head elevated will reduce your recovery time, whereas failure to do so will prolong it and may create disturbing asymmetries.
  • Ask your doctor when you may shower, bathe, and wash your hair. Often this is allowed within a day or two of surgery.
  • You will be able to return to work between three days and two weeks following most cosmetic operations,
    depending on the procedure and your occupation.
  • Do not drive while you are taking pain medication because it will alter your judgment and delay your responses. Following most operations, you will be able to drive once you stop taking pain medication.
  • Consult with your doctor before taking any vitamins or herbal medications which you may believe are harmless. Some of these medications may cause problems.
  • You may resume exercise once your doctor allows it. Do not exercise before that time, even if you feel able. Exercise may worsen your swelling and confound your final result.
  • Vitamin E is falsely perceived to minimize scar visibility. Whether taken in pill form or as a topical cream, there is no evidence that it improves scar appearance.
  • Use extreme caution when exposing yourself to the sun following surgery. During the first year, protect all surgical sites with potent sun block (SPF 15-40).

Special Report: The end of Apple’s iPod era

After years of serving as Apple’s main source of revenue, the iPod’s influence on the company’s financial health has diminished to the point of being effectively irrelevant as a revenue driver, marking an end to the ‘iPod era.’

As the halo effect of the iPod reached its maximum potential, reinvigorated Macintosh sales and deep market penetration by the iPhone have completely taken over as the main source of Apple’s revenue and earnings.  Even the iPad in its inaugural quarter will post more revenue and earnings than the iPod, pushing the device to Apple’s 4th largest source of income.  What’s more, the iPod as a percentage of Apple’s total revenue will drop below 10% in 2011.

A few years ago, I wrote an article detailing the iPod?s diminishing importance to Apple?s revenue growth. As Macintosh sales starting picking up steam, and as the advent of the iPhone assumed the helm of Apple?s future growth prospects, the iPod started a slow descent down from its throne as Apple?s key revenue driver.

In January 2006, when Apple hit all time highs of $86.40, I remember how investors and financial analysts feared Apple?s best years were behind it. This fear, while apparently unfounded in retrospect, stemmed from the perception that the iPod was near market saturation, and that Apple wouldn?t be able to innovate further. And though the market akin to a raging bull, investors saw Apple?s share price drop from $86.40 to $50.00 by that July.

Turn the page to 2010, the iPod is a mere afterthought and Apple has since seen its share price grow almost 6 fold. And while the iPod demonstrated a lot more resilience than anticipated by the financial world, posting record quarter after record quarter through 2008, its significance as a revenue driver has now diminished to the point of being almost irrelevant to Apple?s overall growth. In Q1 2006, the iPod accounted for an astonishing 55.55% — or more than half — of Apple?s total revenue.

For the 2010 holiday shopping season, though the iPod posted 250% more revenue than it did in 2006, it only accounted for 21.62% or just a fifth of Apple?s total revenue. That right there is a very tangible example of Apple?s ability to innovate in the face of an inevitable and impending slowdown of its main revenue driver, the iPod. The chart below details iPod revenue as a percentage of Apple?s total revenue from 2006 through 2010. Please note that Q3 and Q4 of 2010 are merely estimates based on a detail analysis I?ve published, and that actual results may vary.

iPod Rev

Notice how the iPod?s impact to Apple?s total revenue has been on a consistent and continual downtrend since 2006. It is as if the importance of the iPod wanes by the day. In fact, I?m projecting that the iPod as a percentage of Apple?s overall revenue will fall under 10% for the first time in Q4 of this year. And to get an idea of just how significant that really is, I?m expecting iTunes to account for 6.9% of total revenue in the same quarter. That?s an indication that the iPod is becoming just as insignificant of a revenue driver as is iTunes.

Yet, the chart above is even more impressive when one makes a side by side comparison to Apple?s total revenue in the same period. Even though the iPod has a diminishing impact on Apple?s total sales from 2006 to present, Apple?s revenue has outright exploded.

In Q1 2006, Apple reported $5.75 billion in revenue of which 55% were iPod sales. In 2010, Apple reported $15.7 billion or almost triple what it reported in 2006. Yet iPod sales only accounted for a meager 21.6% of that revenue. Any way you look at it, Apple is no longer dependent on the iPod, and any future signs of weakness should produce nothing more than a yawn. The chart below is a quarterly overview of Apple?s revenue from 2006 to 2010. Please be advised that Q3 and Q4 are merely projections, and that actual results may vary. A detailed look at how I arrived at those estimates can be found here.

iPod Rev

Though the iPod is contributing less in terms of percentages, it still makes very hefty contributions in terms of revenue. In fact, while iPod revenue as a percentage of Apple?s overall revenue has been on a constant decline since 2006, the iPod has posted very consistent revenue throughout that period of time. The only thing that has changed is Apple?s product lineup, and an untouchable capacity to innovate. Hopefully this article puts the old adage, ?As goes the iPod, so goes the Apple,? definitively the rest. Apple isn?t just the iPod maker or the iPhone maker, it?s a money maker. 2010 marks the end of the iPod era.

iPod Rev

Andy Zaky is a graduate from the UCLA School of Law, an AppleInsider contributor and the founder and author of Bullish Cross — an online publication that provides in-depth analysis of Apple’s financial health.
Special Report: The end of Apple’s iPod era